Germany · Termination Replay

Can you defend your last termination in a German labor court?

We replay one Germany-based termination decision using examiner-grade evidence standards under KSchG, BetrVG, and AGG.

Get an evidence-based determination in 72 hours: DEFENSIBLE · INDETERMINATE · NOT DEFENSIBLE

Not legal advice.
No remediation.
No system integration.
No employee monitoring.

Book a 15-min Scoping Call See Example Determination

Plain-language summary

Aram Algorithm offers a Germany-only termination decision replay service. It outputs a deterministic evidence-based determination (DEFENSIBLE/INDETERMINATE/NOT DEFENSIBLE) based on reconstructable evidence under KSchG, BetrVG, and AGG. It does not monitor employees, integrate with HR systems, or provide legal advice.

How it works

Submit

You submit a completed termination decision (Germany only).

Normalize

We normalize documents into a Decision Envelope.

Replay

We run a deterministic gate replay (G1–G7).

Determination

You receive an evidence-based determination + trace + evidence gap map.

Works council safety

Works Council Safety (BetrVG)

We do not monitor employees.
We do not connect to HR systems.
We do not introduce technical employee monitoring systems (no §87(1) Nr. 6 BetrVG trigger).
We only replay a decision using documents you provide.

If a decision is NOT DEFENSIBLE, the determination reflects evidentiary insufficiency under fail-closed replay rules.

Who this is for

Built for the people who carry the risk.

For HR (Germany)

Know whether a termination survives scrutiny before it escalates.
Reduce surprise in works council objections and litigation.
Produce examiner-grade traces without narrative explanations.

For Legal & Employment Counsel

See what opposing counsel / court can reconstruct from evidence.
Identify primary exposure gates (procedural + substantive).
Preserve privilege boundaries (you choose what to submit).

What you receive

Example Determination (Redacted)

DECISION ID: DE-TERM-2025-XXXX

Jurisdiction: DE · Type: Termination · Date: Redacted

NOT_DEFENSIBLE

G1 · Works Council Hearing (BetrVG §102)FAIL

G2 · Social Justification (KSchG §1)PASS

G3 · Ultima RatioPASS

G4 · ConsistencyPASS (Not Assessed)

G5 · Co-Determination Tech (BetrVG §87)PASS

G6 · Model TransparencyPASS (N/A)

G7 · Anti-Discrimination (AGG §22)PASS

PRIMARY GAP: E1 — Works Council Hearing Record: MISSING
Fail-closed: any FAIL → NOT DEFENSIBLE; any UNKNOWN → INDETERMINATE.
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. No remediation provided.

Scope