For Lawyers For HR & Legal Gate Architecture Replay Gallery Book Scoping Call
Germany · Adversarial Evidence Replay

Where does your termination evidence break under scrutiny?

We show you what opposing counsel would surface from the employer’s evidence under court scrutiny — before they do it in the courtroom.

Get an evidence replay result in 72 hours:
Replayable from evidence · Replay breaks (missing evidence) · Replay breaks (procedural defect)

Evidence replay only. Not legal advice.
No remediation. No system integration.
Two artifact modes: Privileged Work Product or Client-Facing Review.
Book a 15-min Scoping Call See Replay Gallery

Plain-language summary

Aram Algorithm replays completed German termination decisions through a nine-gate architecture (G0–G8) using contemporaneous evidence only. It shows you where the evidence trail holds, where it breaks on missing artifacts, and where it breaks on procedural defect. Delivered in two artifact modes with turnaround from 12 to 72 hours. It does not monitor employees, integrate with HR systems, or provide legal advice.


How it works

How it works

1

Submit

You submit a completed termination decision. Germany only.

2

Screen

G0 Evidence Admissibility Gate: only contemporaneous evidence enters the replay. Post-hoc material is flagged and excluded.

3

Replay

Gate-by-gate adversarial evidence reconstruction through G1–G8.

4

Result

You receive an evidence replay result — replayable, breaks on missing evidence, or breaks on procedural defect — with a severity-prioritised gap map, in your selected artifact mode.


Who this is for

Built for the people who carry the risk.

For Employment Lawyers (Fachanwälte)

  • See what opposing counsel could surface from your client's evidence before court does it for you.
  • Identify procedural and evidentiary breakpoints (§102 hearing completeness, social selection errors) early.
  • Privileged Work Product mode: full gate analysis addressed to you, structured to support attorney work-product and privilege handling (final privilege determinations remain with counsel).
  • Fast turnaround aligned to litigation deadlines: 72h, 24h, or 12h.

For In-House Legal & HR Directors

  • Know whether a termination survives adversarial scrutiny before it escalates.
  • Client-Facing Evidence Review mode: neutral evidence-completeness framing safe for HR/GC review.
  • Reduce surprise in works council objections and Kündigungsschutzverfahren.
  • No integration, no monitoring — we replay from documents you provide.

Gate Architecture

G0–G8: Nine gates. Same checkpoints a court applies.

Gate
Checkpoint
Legal Basis
G0
Evidence Admissibility (pre-filter)
Contemporaneous evidence only
G1
Formal Validity & Notice Period
BGB §§622–623
G2
§102 BetrVG Works Council Hearing
BetrVG §102
G3
Social Justification
KSchG §§1–2
G4
Ultima Ratio / Proportionality
Case law / KSchG
G5
Social Selection Correctness
KSchG §1(3)
G6
Evidence Consistency
Procedural / Evidentiary
G7
Co-Determination & Technology (co-determination trigger plausibility under §87(1) Nr. 6 when monitoring-capable tools were used in the decision pathway)
BetrVG §87 / AI Act
G8
Discrimination / Retaliation
AGG, HinSchG

If evidence is missing at any gate, the gate is marked as a break point. Under fail-closed rules, missing evidence does not default to compliance.


Dual Artifact Modes

Litigation-safe delivery. You choose the privilege level.

Mode A

Privileged Work Product

Full gate-by-gate analysis with ternary findings (DEFENSIBLE / INDETERMINATE / NOT DEFENSIBLE). Addressed to the instructing lawyer by name. Every page marked “PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.”

Structured to support attorney work-product and privilege handling. Final privilege determinations remain with counsel.

Distribution: Lawyer controls. Never shared with client directly.
Mode B

Client-Facing Evidence Review

Sanitised evidence-completeness summary. Neutral language: “evidence complete / partially documented / not documented.” No “failure” or “not defensible” language.

Suitable for HR/GC review. Designed to be low-risk if disclosed.

Marked: “Evidence Completeness Review — Not Legal Advice.”

Both modes generated from the same underlying gate analysis. No additional replay time required. Lawyer selects mode at intake.


Works council safety

Works Council Safety (BetrVG)

If a replay breaks, the result reflects evidentiary insufficiency under fail-closed rules — not a legal conclusion about the termination itself.


Evidence Replay Gallery

Sample Replays


Scope

Scope (Launch v3.0)


Pricing

Pricing

Court-Tomorrow · 24 hours

Urgent Replay

€12,500 per decision
  • Same scope as Standard
  • 24-hour turnaround
  • For cases with imminent hearing dates
  • Court-Pressure depth available
Book urgent call →
Injunction Mode · 12 hours

Emergency Replay

€18,000+ per decision
  • Dedicated engineer, manual triage
  • 12-hour turnaround
  • Einstweilige Verfügung timelines
  • Both artifact modes included
Book emergency call →

Fees cover evidence replay output only. Not legal advice. No discounts — scope tightens instead of price dropping. Both artifact modes included in every tier.

Request a replay

Request an Evidence Replay (Germany)

Submit your case details. We confirm scope eligibility, G0 evidence intake requirements, and engagement terms within one business day.

If your case is out of scope, we tell you fast — no charge.

Or email: mano@aramalgorithm.ai · Book a call