How Aram reviews a German termination file before the Kündigungsschutzklage is filed.
Aram reviews termination records under KSchG, BetrVG, and AGG — gate by gate — so counsel knows where the file holds and where it weakens before litigation strategy is set.
File result: Defensible · At Risk — evidence gap · At Risk — procedural defect
Evidence replay only. Not legal advice.
The termination file review pipeline, at a glance
Aram reviews the termination record so counsel can inspect how the file reads at each legal checkpoint (Prüfstufe), where it weakens under challenge, and how the result is delivered back to the team.
Four connected surfaces around one file
The same termination file is reviewed from four distinct angles so the legal checkpoint review, challenge analysis, report delivery, and public pattern layers remain separate.
- Gate Architecture (Stufenprüfung) shows how the file is reviewed, gate by gate
- Challenge Analysis (Schwachstellenkatalog) shows where the file is likely to weaken under challenge
- Sample Reports (Musterberichte) show how the outputs are delivered, while Case Repository shows where the patterns recur in public cases
Each surface answers a different lawyer-facing question. Together they create one review workflow, not four unrelated pages.
Review the hub diagram, then move into the linked secondary pages.
How the termination file review works
Every termination file passes through one structured review pipeline. Gate Architecture (Stufenprüfung) explains the legal checkpoint logic, Challenge Analysis explains where the file weakens under pressure, Sample Reports show the output surface, and Case Repository anchors those patterns in public BAG cases.
What is the Aram Algorithm termination file review system?
Aram Algorithm is a structured termination file review system for contested German terminations (Kündigungsschutzverfahren). It evaluates completed employer termination files under the Kündigungsschutzgesetz (KSchG), Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG), Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz (AGG), and related employment statutes through an eight-gate review framework (Stufenprüfung G0–G7) with 26 evaluation points.
Who is this system for?
The system serves Fachanwälte für Arbeitsrecht, Syndikusrechtsanwälte (in-house legal counsel), and Personalleiter (HR directors) managing employer-side termination disputes. It provides structured documentary analysis before counsel finalises litigation strategy.
What documentation problem does it address?
German employers risk losing termination disputes when the contemporaneous file (zeitnahe Dokumentation) contains undetected deficiencies under KSchG, BetrVG, or BGB §§ 611a ff. The system identifies these weaknesses in the file before they surface in proceedings, enabling counsel to assess litigation exposure against a structured framework aligned with BAG case law.
Who we help
Fachanwälte für Arbeitsrecht
Review the file the way the Arbeitsgericht will reconstruct it — before the three-week Kündigungsschutzklage deadline runs.
In-House Legal / Syndikusrechtsanwälte
Examine the termination record for documentary and procedural gaps before escalation to external counsel.
HR Departments (Personalleiter)
Identify where documentation is incomplete — before the file reaches legal review or the Betriebsrat is notified.
The connected page set
Gate Architecture (Stufenprüfung)
The legal checkpoint view: what the file must demonstrate at each of the eight review stages (G0–G7) under KSchG, BetrVG, and AGG.
Open Gate Architecture →Challenge Analysis (Schwachstellenkatalog)
The challenge view: where the same file is likely to weaken first under scrutiny from opposing counsel or the Arbeitsgericht.
Open Challenge Analysis →Sample Reports (Musterberichte)
The output surface: sample Prüfberichte, Fallkarten, and detailed reviews shown in lawyer-facing format.
Open Sample Reports →Case Repository (Fallarchiv)
The public pattern layer: BAG-linked case groupings that show where the same documentary weaknesses appear in reported decisions.
Open Case Repository →Why cases weaken
Most termination decisions do not fail because the underlying reason was wrong. They fail because the contemporaneous file (zeitnahe Dokumentation) cannot carry the review, the challenge, or the court’s reconstruction. Under §1 KSchG, the burden of proof lies with the employer — not the employee.
- Evidence is missing or was not documented at the time of the event
- Documentation is inconsistent or does not support the stated ground
- Procedural steps (Abmahnung, §102 BetrVG consultation) cannot be reconstructed from the file
Labour courts (Arbeitsgerichte) do not evaluate intention. They reconstruct the contemporaneous record.
Questions counsel asks before opening a review.
Scope, evidence rules, outputs, statute coverage, and timing — clarified before the scoping call.
Review your termination file before counsel’s strategy hardens around a weak record.
For Fachanwälte für Arbeitsrecht, Syndikusrechtsanwälte, and Personalleiter.
Submit your file. We confirm scope and documentation eligibility within one business day.
If your file is out of scope, we tell you promptly — no charge.
Or email: mano@aramalgorithm.ai · Book a call