[
  {
    "id": "P1",
    "number": 1,
    "title": "Behavioral Termination After Multiple Warnings",
    "description": "Employee repeatedly violates workplace rules despite multiple formal warnings (Abmahnung).",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-282-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-284-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-541-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-495-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-258-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-955-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-646-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-638-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-217-15"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P2",
    "number": 2,
    "title": "Missing or Weak Warning in the Disciplinary Escalation Ladder",
    "description": "Terminations that failed because the employer skipped, invalidated, or inadequately documented the required Abmahnung before dismissal.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-283-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-186-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-609-00",
      "BAG-2-AZR-63-03",
      "BAG-2-AZR-603-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-541-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-782-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-284-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-638-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-282-10"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P3",
    "number": 3,
    "title": "Works Council Consultation Collapse (§102 BetrVG)",
    "description": "Terminations that failed because the works council consultation was missing, incomplete, inaccurate, or relied on facts not communicated during the hearing.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-678-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-797-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-273-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-280-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-736-13",
      "BAG-6-AZR-845-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-15-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-681-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-352-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-700-15"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P4",
    "number": 4,
    "title": "Warning–Termination Mismatch",
    "description": "Terminations that failed because prior warnings concerned different misconduct than the final dismissal — the escalation ladder collapsed due to non-einschlägig warnings.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-646-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-955-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-284-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-381-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-543-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-751-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-495-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-217-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-569-14",
      "BAG-2-AZR-531-14"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P5",
    "number": 5,
    "title": "Verdachtskündigung — Suspicion Dismissal",
    "description": "Terminations based on suspicion of serious misconduct that failed because the suspicion was insufficiently concrete, the investigation incomplete, or the employee was not properly confronted with the allegations before dismissal.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-611-17",
      "BAG-2-AZR-1037-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-206-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-102-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-256-14",
      "BAG-2-AZR-694-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-700-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-801-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-961-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-424-01"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P6",
    "number": 6,
    "title": "Extraordinary Dismissal Timing Failure (§626 Abs. 2 BGB)",
    "description": "Extraordinary terminations that failed because the employer did not issue dismissal within the two-week deadline after gaining reliable knowledge of the decisive facts — even when the underlying misconduct was real.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-255-04",
      "BAG-2-AZR-333-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-825-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-570-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-46-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-234-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-25-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-380-00",
      "BAG-2-AZR-852-98",
      "BAG-2-AZR-85-15"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P7",
    "number": 7,
    "title": "Suspicion Dismissal Without Proper Employee Hearing",
    "description": "Suspicion-based terminations that failed because the employee was not properly confronted with the allegations or given a real opportunity to respond before dismissal was issued.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-546-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-722-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-474-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-395-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-235-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-55-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-426-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-825-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-240-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-449-15"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P8",
    "number": 8,
    "title": "Evidence Reconstruction Failure in Termination Litigation",
    "description": "Terminations that failed because the employer could not reconstruct the evidence chain, investigation steps, or procedural decisions that led to dismissal — the incident-to-termination sequence collapsed under court scrutiny.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-541-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-258-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-483-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-297-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-673-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-19-23",
      "BAG-2-AZR-698-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-68-24",
      "BAG-2-AZR-597-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-302-16"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P9",
    "number": 9,
    "title": "Termination Collapse After Judicial Evidence Reconstruction",
    "description": "Terminations that failed when courts reconstructed the employer's decision process and found the evidence chain, proportionality analysis, or procedural steps insufficient to survive judicial replay.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-86-17",
      "BAG-2-AZR-323-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-748-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-773-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-370-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-6-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-50-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-153-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-848-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-296-22"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P10",
    "number": 10,
    "title": "Suspicion-Based Dismissal Hearing Defects",
    "description": "Suspicion-based dismissals (Verdachtskündigung) that failed because the employee was not given a proper pre-termination hearing, the specific allegations were not disclosed, or the hearing was merely pro forma.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-743-98",
      "BAG-2-AZR-540-81",
      "BAG-2-AZR-98-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-508-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-133-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-923-98",
      "BAG-2-AZR-324-85",
      "BAG-2-AZR-965-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-283-86",
      "BAG-2-AZR-732-11"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P11",
    "number": 11,
    "title": "Interest Balancing Failure in Termination",
    "description": "Dismissals that collapsed because the employer failed to properly weigh competing interests — employee tenure, age, family obligations, severity of misconduct, and alternative sanctions were not adequately considered.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-125-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-28-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-355-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-644-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-845-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-651-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-272-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-415-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-596-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-75-99"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P12",
    "number": 12,
    "title": "Warning Dispensability Misjudgment",
    "description": "Dismissals where the employer wrongly assumed a prior warning (Abmahnung) was unnecessary. Courts found the misconduct was correctable and the trust relationship was not irreparably destroyed.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-651-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-845-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-485-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-526-96",
      "BAG-2-AZR-483-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-194-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-1039-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-233-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-675-07",
      "BAG-2-AZR-667-02"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P13",
    "number": 13,
    "title": "Defective Works Council Consultation",
    "description": "Dismissals void because the §102 BetrVG works council consultation was defective — information was incomplete, misleading, or the hearing process was improperly conducted.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-732-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-182-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-551-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-55-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-31-94",
      "BAG-2-AZR-461-03",
      "BAG-2-AZR-407-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-687-97",
      "BAG-2-AZR-345-15",
      "BAG-2-AZR-11-22"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P14",
    "number": 14,
    "title": "Extraordinary Dismissal Deadline Failure (§626 Abs. 2 BGB)",
    "description": "Extraordinary dismissals that failed because the employer missed the two-week deadline under §626(2) BGB, or disputes arose about when knowledge was obtained and who counts as the relevant decision-maker.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-582-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-433-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-357-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-442-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-457-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-245-04",
      "BAG-2-AZR-601-02",
      "BAG-2-AZR-57-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-238-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-390-19"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P15",
    "number": 15,
    "title": "Petty Theft / Bagatelle Dismissal",
    "description": "Dismissals for minor property offenses challenged as disproportionate under the Emmely doctrine — courts apply heightened proportionality scrutiny weighing the value involved, tenure, and trust destruction.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-133-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-485-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-721-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-923-98",
      "BAG-2-AZR-620-96",
      "BAG-2-AZR-454-99",
      "BAG-2-AZR-366-04",
      "BAG-2-AZR-3-83",
      "BAG-2-AZR-264-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-994-12"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P16",
    "number": 16,
    "title": "Illness-Based Person-Related Dismissal",
    "description": "Dismissals due to illness that failed the three-step test: negative health prognosis, significant operational disruption, and interest balancing. Includes bEM (workplace reintegration management) duty failures.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-125-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-162-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-565-14",
      "BAG-2-AZR-664-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-984-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-582-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-565-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-32-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-636-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-649-94"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P17",
    "number": 17,
    "title": "Evidence Prohibition in Dismissal (Beweisverwertungsverbot)",
    "description": "Dismissals that collapsed because key evidence was obtained unlawfully — through covert surveillance, keyloggers, or disproportionate monitoring methods violating employee privacy rights.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-133-18",
      "BAG-2-AZR-485-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-812-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-581-04",
      "BAG-2-AZR-179-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-200-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-298-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-342-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-17-23",
      "BAG-2-AZR-309-22"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P18",
    "number": 18,
    "title": "Private Internet Use Dismissal",
    "description": "Dismissals for unauthorized private internet or email use during working hours — courts examine company policy clarity, usage extent, content nature, and whether monitoring evidence was lawfully obtained.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-581-04",
      "BAG-2-AZR-179-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-200-06",
      "BAG-2-AZR-812-16",
      "BAG-2-AZR-386-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-28-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-17-23",
      "BAG-2-AZR-298-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-342-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-309-22"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P19",
    "number": 19,
    "title": "Working Time Fraud Dismissal (Arbeitszeitbetrug)",
    "description": "Dismissals for deliberate falsification of time records — courts examine proof of intentional manipulation vs. innocent error, and whether the trust relationship was irreparably destroyed.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-39-05",
      "BAG-2-AZR-682-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-721-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-433-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-356-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-457-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-442-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-508-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-845-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-845-11"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P20",
    "number": 20,
    "title": "Alcohol-Related Workplace Dismissal",
    "description": "Dismissals for alcohol-related conduct — courts distinguish addiction (person-related, requiring rehabilitation) from willful misuse (conduct-related, following warning escalation), with different legal standards.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-649-94",
      "BAG-2-AZR-32-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-565-12",
      "BAG-2-AZR-636-09",
      "BAG-2-AZR-565-14",
      "BAG-2-AZR-984-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-582-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-125-21",
      "BAG-2-AZR-162-22",
      "BAG-2-AZR-664-13"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "P21",
    "number": 21,
    "title": "Competitive Activity Dismissal (Konkurrenztätigkeit)",
    "description": "Dismissals for engaging in competitive activity or unauthorized side employment during the employment relationship — courts examine whether the activity was truly competitive, whether the employer provoked it, and proportionality.",
    "caseIds": [
      "BAG-2-AZR-1008-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-644-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-457-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-560-20",
      "BAG-2-AZR-62-11",
      "BAG-2-AZR-845-08",
      "BAG-2-AZR-355-10",
      "BAG-2-AZR-651-13",
      "BAG-2-AZR-28-19",
      "BAG-2-AZR-596-20"
    ]
  }
]