Scenario CAN-09: Clean Misconduct Termination
Scenario (Complete Evidence)
Breaks (Missing Evidence)
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityPASS
G1 Formal ValidityPASS
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)PASS
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)PASS
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityPASS
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)PASS
Primary GapNo comparator cases documented. G6 returned UNKNOWN, blocking a clean replay under fail-closed rules. This is where opposing counsel would start.
To Move This VerdictDocumentation of how comparable past misconduct cases were handled at the same establishment.
Scenario CAN-01: Works Council Retaliation Dismissal
Scenario (Complete Evidence)
Replay Breaks
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityPASS
G1 Formal ValidityPASS
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)FAIL
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)FAIL
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityFAIL
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)FAIL
Primary GapWorks council hearing evidence missing. Retaliation indicators present against protected employee representative. Multiple gate failures — replay cannot proceed.
To Move This VerdictComplete §102 BetrVG hearing record with documented timeline and works council response.
Scenario CAN-04: Compliance Reporter Dismissal
Scenario (Complete Evidence)
Breaks (Missing Evidence)
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityPASS
G1 Formal ValidityPASS
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)PASS
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)UNKNOWN
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityUNKNOWN
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG/HinSchG)UNKNOWN
Primary GapSocial justification evidence unverifiable. Whistleblower retaliation risk not excludable from available evidence. HinSchG exposure flagged at G8.
To Move This VerdictPerformance documentation predating the compliance report, plus written termination rationale independent of the report.
Public Record: Works Council Chair Dismissal (Ambulance Services)
Public Sources Only (Illustrative)
Replay Breaks
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityLIMITED
G1 Formal ValidityUNKNOWN
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)UNKNOWN
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)UNKNOWN
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityUNKNOWN
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)FAIL
Primary GapPublic sources indicate retaliation signal against works council chair. Anti-discrimination gate failed on prima facie retaliation evidence.
To Move This VerdictInternal termination file, works council hearing record, and documented non-retaliatory rationale.
Public sources do not allow verification of internal procedural steps. Verdict reflects evidence available in public record only.
Public Record: Works Council Chair Dismissal (Manufacturing)
Public Sources Only (Illustrative)
Replay Breaks
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityLIMITED
G1 Formal ValidityUNKNOWN
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)UNKNOWN
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)UNKNOWN
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityUNKNOWN
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)FAIL
Primary GapPublic sources indicate retaliation signal against works council chair. Dismissal pending labor court review.
To Move This VerdictInternal evidence pack demonstrating procedural compliance and non-retaliatory basis.
Public sources do not allow verification of internal procedural steps.
Public Record: Termination During Works Council Election (Energy Sector)
Public Sources Only (Illustrative)
Replay Breaks
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityLIMITED
G1 Formal ValidityUNKNOWN
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)UNKNOWN
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)UNKNOWN
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityUNKNOWN
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)FAIL
Primary GapExtraordinary termination issued during active works council election. Strong retaliation signal in public record.
To Move This Verdict§626 BGB two-week deadline evidence, investigation file, and documented non-retaliatory basis.
Public sources do not allow verification of internal procedural steps.
Public Record: Election Initiators Terminated (Education Sector)
Public Sources Only (Illustrative)
Replay Breaks
G0 Evidence AdmissibilityLIMITED
G1 Formal ValidityUNKNOWN
G2 Works Council Hearing (§102 BetrVG)UNKNOWN
G3 Social Justification (§1 KSchG)UNKNOWN
G4 Ultima Ratio / ProportionalityUNKNOWN
G5 Social SelectionN/A
G6 Evidence ConsistencyUNKNOWN
G7 Co-Determination / TechN/A
G8 Discrimination / Retaliation (AGG)FAIL
Primary GapMultiple employees who initiated works council election subsequently terminated. Pattern indicates retaliation.
To Move This VerdictIndividual termination files per employee, each with independent non-retaliatory justification.
Public sources do not allow verification of internal procedural steps.
Germany · Evidence Replay